Editing the "other side" of reconciled transactions
Phil Longstaff
plongstaff at rogers.com
Sun Jan 13 14:01:08 EST 2008
Tim Jackson wrote:
> I've been using GnuCash for many years, and one thing puzzles me. I'm
> not sure whether this is something I've ever been able to do, or
> something that's changed in GC2:
>
> If I have a transaction reconciled on one side but not the other, why
> can't I change the account which the non-reconciled side is pointing to?
> This is very frequent when I, for example have a transaction like this:
>
> Debit Credit
> Some Transaction:
> Assets:My Bank Account 1.00
> Expenses:Something 1.00
>
> Now, I reconcile my bank accounts monthly (in accordance with the
> statements I receive), which is fine. However, I often want (e.g. at the
> end of a year) to "juggle around" the expenses to which payments are
> allocated, perhaps to gain a greater sense of granularity or just to
> make things more consistent. Logically (to me) I should be able to do
> this without affecting the reconciliation status, because I'm not
> changing the reconciled side of the transaction. However, GC doesn't
> appear to be allow me to do this without:
>
> - remembering the reconciled amount on the bank account
> - forcibly unreconciling the bank account side (which makes the account
> reconciliation wrong)
> - Making the change
> - Re-reconciling the bank account with the previously-memorised figure
>
> This seems like a slow, "dangerous" (from the point of view of
> unreconciling stuff which is correctly reconciled) and wholly
> unnecessary procedure.
>
> I can't find anything in the docs, or an option to disable this behaviour.
>
> Can anyone convince me of why it works like this and/or give me a
> workaround? Or should I file a feature request? (or is there already one?)
>
What version are you using? I can edit the other side of a reconciled
transaction in 2.2.3, and I am sure I've done it in previous versions.
Phil
More information about the gnucash-user
mailing list