GNUCASH 2.2.9 WINDOWS XP SP2 DEAD!

[David T.]

I am curious. You mentioned that the first time, Gnucash started up fine, but the next time, it took 15 minutes. What does the process tree look like that first time? I wonder if somehow the second gconf process is indicative of the problem. 

Also, in the process list, what are the CPU use percentages?

David

--- On Thu, 5/7/09, Kim_Wood <kim.wood at bigpond.net.au> wrote:

> From: Kim_Wood <kim.wood at bigpond.net.au>
> Subject: Re: GNUCASH 2.2.9 WINDOWS XP SP2 DEAD!
> To: gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> Date: Thursday, May 7, 2009, 10:49 PM
> Windows Task Manager reports the following GNUCash processes
> running:
> 
> guncash-bin.exe     12,276 K memory usage
> gconfd-2.exe           4,040 K
> gconfd-2.exe           2,564 K
> 
> I have only started one instance of GNUCash - so not sure
> why two
> gconfd-2.exe processes running?  No other applications
> running (ie: not
> Firefox).  I also disabled the majority of startup
> processes, with no change
> to GNUCash startup time.
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> Kim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Arla wrote:
> > 
> > Kim,
> > 
> > Couple of thoughts, I have had this happen too,
> however most of the time
> > it seems to be when I have firefox open and lots of
> tabs (of various
> > types, possibly including IE tabs) open, and GNUCash
> just seems to hang (I
> > must admit, I'm never patient enough to wait 15
> minutes to see if starts).
> > 
> > Do you have anything else running when it's
> failing to run? Also, what
> > processes (of the GNUCash ones) are running, is it
> just the
> > gnucash-bin.exe, or do the gconfd-2 processes start as
> well?
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/GNUCASH-2.2.9-WINDOWS-XP-SP2-DEAD%21-tp23423962p23440491.html
> Sent from the GnuCash - User mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.