Question for those that can load and use 2.3.9
Kevin Buckley
kevin.m.buckley at gmail.com
Mon Feb 22 23:21:41 EST 2010
>> I think he was asking if the XML store is going to continue on as a
>> back end storage option for the foreseeable future.
Is he though?
There is surely a difference between where an "Undo" would happen
during an invocation of GnuCash, ie within the "GnuCash Engine",
currently, I believe, still a set of in-memory structs, and where one
would choose to keep one's data between invocations of GnuCash.
> Oh! Certainly for the 2.4 series and probably even the 2.6 series
> (where it will no longer be the default). But beyond that I'm hoping
> XML gets relegated to an interchange format where it's best suited.
So one would have to have compile/install against a database just to
be able to use GnuCash at all? Or not?
> It works great for (quazi-)static documents, but XML is not a database.
And the storing of information between invocations of GnuCash is
not static and so not an area where XML works great ?
More information about the gnucash-user
mailing list