Sorting

[Derek Atkins]

Daniel Richard <drichard58 at gmail.com> writes:

> I deleting the number like you suggested, but it didn't change
> anything.  Since the numbers go 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 110, 111,
> 112, 105, 106, 107, ...., I even created a new entry and typed in 105
> as the number.  Instead of placing it after 104 in the list, it put it
> right after the existing 105.

That would be correct behavior..  If you have two items with the same
number they will get sorted together, but the date you enter the
transaction will then take precedence.  So the #105 you enter on January
10 will appear after the #105 entered in December of last year.

> I also took another account (savings) that does not have check numbers
> and entered in some bogus numbers out of order and had it sort them.
> This also failed.  So this does not seem to be specific to the one
> account, but common to all of them.

Interesting.  It does sound like a potential sort issue...

> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

-derek

-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       warlord at MIT.EDU                        PGP key available