Using 2.2.9 vs. 2.3.x

[allan]

Hi,

I have two environments: Linux using 2.2.9 and Windoz using 2.3.7 and we have not had any database issues nor file 
issues. Of course, we are not using a database backend, just the default XML.
If this helps - good.

Peace,
Allan

Paul A. wrote:
> I know that nothing is guaranteed for the 2.3.x versions, but at the same
> time there are good reasons for running them instead of 2.2.9:
> 
> 1. If they don't implode, they presumably work much better.
> 
> 2. The more people use 2.3.x (and report any problems), the more reliable it
> becomes.
> 
> Have there been any reports at all of corrupted backups when running 2.3.x? 
> If not, it would seem reasonable to run 2.3.x  as my normal working version
> and revert one level in the unlikely event of a crash.
> 
> Is there any information, even just anecdotal, about the incidence of
> crashes in the latest 2.3.x versus 2.2.9?