Pls help model this situation
jhw
johnhwoods+gnucash at googlemail.com
Tue Jul 20 09:05:40 EDT 2010
Hi Jim, thanks a lot for your quick response. It's probably because I can't
get my head round basic accountancy principles, but I still can't seem to
grok this.
Does this mean that when I pay the farrier, I don't enter a transaction from
Checking to Expenses:Horse but instead transfer the amount to A/R? What
happens then if he doesn't pay for that particular bill - do I transfer from
A/R to Expenses:Horse?
What about owing child support? I don't want to put an entry in my checking
account because it's not something that decreases this balance - rather it
is more like owed income - income I should have had but didn't get. If I
put Income:RealDad (it's _me_ that's the stepfather!) as the other account
in A/R I end up with a -ve income for him. That seems to make sense to me:
e.g. Income:Salary shows $2000 and Income:ReadDad shows: -$720. That looks
ok - apart from the fact that Income is then shown as a total of $2720,
because gnucash sums the absolute values for some reason. So while I
understand how I can put new amounts for physical expenses into A/R when I
pay bills, I don't see where money like the missing child support is
supposed to come from. Well I know the person it's supposed to come from,
just not the gnucash account!
Sorry for being so dim. Any help you can dispense is most welcome.
--
View this message in context: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/Pls-help-model-this-situation-tp2295294p2295458.html
Sent from the GnuCash - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the gnucash-user
mailing list