Print Checks

[Thomas Troesch]

The current release can print 3-up business checks as well as voucher
checks.  When checks are printed one at a time an address can also be
printed.  Multiple checks can be printed by doing a search first, and then
Print Checks will print all the checks from the search.  There also have
been some changes for blocking characters and the text line for the amount.
 Look at http://svn.gnucash.org/docs/help/print-check.html to get an idea.

These changes were done within the last two years.

Examples are provided, but unless ( and perhaps even if ) you can use
Quicken format, you will likely have to tweak some of the position
parameters.  The documentation is your friend.  See
http://svn.gnucash.org/docs/guide/check_format_info.html and use Custom
format to get things setup for your check format and printer.

I don't know about printing the business name and logo.  These things are
usually pre-printed when checks are ordered.

I hope this helps.

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:54 PM, baconmaker <leanbaconmaker at gmail.com>wrote:

> Has any progress been made in the last 2 years on this issue?  I am wanting
> to print 3 to a sheet business size checks.  Virtually every other issue I
> thought I had with GnuCash has been solved with enough looking.  Good job
> everyone on a very versatile and adaptable program.  It would be really
> nice
> to have more check printing formats though.
>
> Being able to print my business name and address on the checks, along with
> maybe an icon, would be a nice feature also.
>
> Sorry, I do not know how to cc this to dev.  If someone could explain, I
> would appreciate it.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/Print-Checks-tp1429750p3451153.html
> Sent from the GnuCash - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>