Can't run 2.4.10 (was: GnuCash 2.4.10 released)

John Ralls jralls at ceridwen.us
Sun Feb 12 12:30:57 EST 2012


On Feb 12, 2012, at 1:39 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:

> Op zaterdag 11 februari 2012 11:40:10 schreef John Ralls:
>> It seems to have failed in MinGW again, this time while trying to extract
>> binutils for mingw.
>> 
> No, it didn't fail while trying to extract binutils. What you saw was the 
> result of an itermediate test, where I enabled bash debug output to check 
> where things go wrong exactly. Since I noticed that build started installing 
> mingw properly, I aborted it, but the build script automatically upload the 
> buildlog.
> 
> I then started a new build without debug info (the log file would be way to 
> big). This one ran successfully, but due to a typo in the build_package.sh 
> script, it was never uploaded. I have manually uploaded it now.
> 
> There's one thing to point out though:
> Only the tag was named 2.4.10-1. Internally, the version is still considered 
> 2.4.10. As a result the build scripts will build a packages called 
> gnucash-2.4.10-setup.exe, which means that any tag build already uploaded will 
> be overwritten. Is that ok or should we alter the build scripts to upload a 
> package with the name of the tag instead ?

Great. I'll get the rest of it done in a little while.

I wouldn't worry about naming the package. This is a pretty rare occurrence, and it can be handled manually when it does happen. I'll just make a note of it on the "Release" wiki page.

Regards,
John Ralls




More information about the gnucash-user mailing list