Can't run 2.4.10 (was: GnuCash 2.4.10 released)

[Geert Janssens]

Op zondag 12 februari 2012 09:30:57 schreef John Ralls:
> On Feb 12, 2012, at 1:39 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> > Op zaterdag 11 februari 2012 11:40:10 schreef John Ralls:
> >> It seems to have failed in MinGW again, this time while trying to
> >> extract binutils for mingw.
> > 
> > No, it didn't fail while trying to extract binutils. What you saw was
> > the
> > result of an itermediate test, where I enabled bash debug output to
> > check
> > where things go wrong exactly. Since I noticed that build started
> > installing mingw properly, I aborted it, but the build script
> > automatically upload the buildlog.
> > 
> > I then started a new build without debug info (the log file would be way
> > to big). This one ran successfully, but due to a typo in the
> > build_package.sh script, it was never uploaded. I have manually
> > uploaded it now.
> > 
> > There's one thing to point out though:
> > Only the tag was named 2.4.10-1. Internally, the version is still
> > considered 2.4.10. As a result the build scripts will build a packages
> > called gnucash-2.4.10-setup.exe, which means that any tag build already
> > uploaded will be overwritten. Is that ok or should we alter the build
> > scripts to upload a package with the name of the tag instead ?
> 
> Great. I'll get the rest of it done in a little while.
> 
> I wouldn't worry about naming the package. This is a pretty rare occurrence,
> and it can be handled manually when it does happen. I'll just make a note
> of it on the "Release" wiki page.
> 
Ok, and thanks for handling remainder of the release.

For completeness, I have tested 2.4.10-1 on my windows box, 16-bit and it 
works fine.

Geert