Any sign of payroll yet?

[R. Victor Klassen]

Yeah, the payroll hack I’ve written is a) specific to the rules for our special case, and b)  command line interface - so it wouldn’t be very widely applicable.   Once I’ve had it through another couple of cycles I’ll be willing to release it, but don’t know how many folks would find it useful.


On Feb 7, 2014, at 10:30 PM, Derek Atkins <derek at ihtfp.com> wrote:

> Plenty of businesses use GnuCash without payroll
> 
> Doing payroll right is hard. It requires significant recurring updates of local tax rates, rules, etc. It would be a full time job to do that.  Best case GnuCash could create a framework and require the end user to enter the details.  Even getting the rules input would require lots of effort.
> 
> Patches always welcome.
> 
> -derek
> 
> Sent from my HTC smartphone
> 
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "ToddAndMargo" <ToddAndMargo at zoho.com>
> To: <gnucash-user at gnucash.org>
> Subject: Any sign of payroll yet?
> Date: Fri, Feb 7, 2014 10:20 PM
> 
> 
> On 02/07/2014 07:13 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>> Do you have the code ready to donate?  If not, then no.
>> 
>> -derek
> 
> 
> Rats.  That is the biggest hold up to getting folks
> to even look at it.  That and their accountant inevitably
> is a wiz at Quick Books.
> 
> Thank you for the response!
> 
> -T
> 
> -- 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Computers are like air conditioners.
> They malfunction when you open windows
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.