Announcement: Windows 2.6.4 Re-released. 2014-10-10

[Dave H]

Geert,

Seems the build has finished so I have downloaded and installed
gnucash-2.6.4-setup.exe 2014-10-11 21:15 from
http://code.gnucash.org/builds/win32/releases/ which seems to have cured
the unreadable characters issue on Windows.

Thanks Dave H.


On 12 October 2014 06:09, Geert Janssens <geert.gnucash at kobaltwit.be> wrote:

> On Saturday 11 October 2014 17:51:16 Cristian Marchi wrote:
> > Il 11/10/2014 15.46, Geert Janssens ha scritto:
> > > Apparently the issue appears to be  that pango is looking for its
> > > modules in the wrong spot by default.
> > >
> > > This can be fixed by running
> > > c:\program files\gnucash\bin\pango-querymodules.exe --system
> > > --update- cache
> > > (Will probably need admin rights on Windows Vista and up). I have
> > > updated the Windows installer to do so automatically at the end of
> > > the installation process.
> >
> > That was it! everything's back to normal now
> >
> > Many thanks Geert
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnucash-user mailing list
> > gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> > -----
> > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>
> Good.
>
> A new release build is currently running and should appear at
> http://code.gnucash.org/builds/win32/releases/
> later today.
>
> If someone wants to give it a test run when it appears and confirms it
> works, I can make the official release announcement tomorrow. I'm off
> for today.
>
> For those willing to test: pay attention because there is already a
> build dated 2014-10-10. That's yesterday's build. You should wait for
> the build dated 2014-10-11.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Geert
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>