Reconciliation

[Andy Pastuszak]

If I did set that option, I did not do so intentionally.  I'm still working
my way around the software.

Andy

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Alex Aycinena <alex.aycinena at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Andy,
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Andy Pastuszak <apastuszak at gmail.com>
> > To: Gnucash Users <gnucash-user at gnucash.org>
> > Cc:
> > Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:15:57 -0500
> > Subject: Re: Reconciliation
> > Ok, I think I found the problem.  It seems there is a T-Num and Num
> field.
> > When Double Line is turned off.  The only available field is Num and not
> > T-Num.  So, as I keyed in transactions, I put them in the Num field, as I
> > would think anyone would.  Even if you go double line, the T-Num box is
> > below the Num box is isn't likely to be used by someone.
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
> You may have found a bug. Your comment implies that you set the option in
> File->Properties to use the split action field as the displayed number. Is
> that correct?
>
> I implemented that feature in gnucash recently. I may have left out of the
> reconciliation code the logic to reflect that choice. I will look into that
> in the next few days and, if so, fix it so that it works correctly in the
> next release.
>
> Regards,
>
> Alex
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>