Reconciliation

life0riley life0s_50 at yahoo.com
Mon Feb 23 23:28:23 EST 2015


Alex Aycinena-2 wrote
> 
> I don't believe this is exactly correct. When you create a new book you
> are
> given the choice to set this option. It defaults to 'not selected', so
> Andy
> could have set it, either intentionally or not, when he created the book.
> It is also possible to go and change the setting any time afterwards, So
> Andy may have set it later, also, either intentionally or not. (If you do
> change it later, you will end up with transactions that have the 'number'
> in one field before the change and in another field after the change.
> There
> is a warning about this in the help description.) Depending on how this
> option is set, the register shows a 'T-num' field on the second line or
> not. That is why some of you are seeing it and some of you are not (you
> don't have that option set).
> 
> For users who come from a Quicken background, and transfer their data from
> there, setting that option will make gnucash behave like Quicken in terms
> of how the 'num' field is displayed in different registers (that is, the
> same transaction can have different 'numbers' displayed in different
> registers; the T-num, if used will be the same in all registers for a
> given
> transaction).
> 
> For Andy, if he wants to keep this behaviour, there is no need to start
> his
> book all over again. If there is a bug in the reconciliation window, I
> just
> need to fix that. Meanwhile, Andy can do his reconciliations without
> seeing
> his numbers and just focusing on the amount and dates.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Alex
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list

> gnucash-user@

> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

Does this mean that "Use Split Action Field for Number" has to be unchecked
for the check numbers to show in the reconciliation window or is this a bug?

Thanks,

life0riley



--
View this message in context: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/Reconciliation-tp4676319p4676420.html
Sent from the GnuCash - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


More information about the gnucash-user mailing list