Budget reporting for a time interval

[R. Victor Klassen]

What I did was move the original budget.scm file aside and then replaced it with the one with the new features.

(after the experiment I moved the original back, since I can’t start GnuCash with the new .scm file).


On Jul 5, 2015, at 7:31 AM, Jim Passmore <jim at passmore4.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 4:21 PM, R. Victor Klassen <rvklassen at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> 15-07-04 3:53:41 PM    [0x0-0x254053e].org.gnucash.Gnucash[54770]    In
>> ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>> 15-07-04 3:53:41 PM    [0x0-0x254053e].org.gnucash.Gnucash[54770]    2867:
>> 1 [resolve-interface (gnucash report standard-reports ...) #:select ...]
>> 15-07-04 3:53:41 PM    [0x0-0x254053e].org.gnucash.Gnucash[54770]    In
>> unknown file:
>> 15-07-04 3:53:41 PM    [0x0-0x254053e].org.gnucash.Gnucash[54770]       ?:
>> 0 [scm-error misc-error #f ...]
>> 15-07-04 3:53:41 PM    [0x0-0x254053e].org.gnucash.Gnucash[54770]
>> ERROR: In procedure scm-error:
>> 15-07-04 3:53:41 PM    [0x0-0x254053e].org.gnucash.Gnucash[54770]
>> ERROR: no code for module (gnucash report standard-reports budget)
>> 15-07-04 3:53:41 PM    com.apple.launchd.peruser.503[154]
>> ([0x0-0x254053e].org.gnucash.Gnucash[54770]) Exited with exit code: 1
>> 
>> 
> Can't help much here, as I don't know macs or SCM. (Making the edits to the
> SCM file was an experiment for me.  Another reason I didn't want to replace
> my original!)   Reading the trace, the ERROR lines near bottom suggest to
> me that something has happened to the budget.scm file.  Did you edit or
> replace the original?  Or maybe the original file and the new report SCM
> file are both there and define themselves in the same way?  Grasping at
> straws here...
> 
> 
> -- 
> *Jim Passmore*
> Linux User #232777
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.