Help with Budget on version 2.6.11 Windows 10

[Phil Longstaff]

What does your account hierarchy look like? Do you have more than one top
level account named Income or Expenses?

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Richard Walker <
trustmeimanengineer at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> Me too - definitely an issue in there somewhere as far as I can tell. I
> haven't got around to filing a bug report but I did the first step of
> trying to create a test case.
>
> I created a test case in GnuCash 2.6.11, and surprise surprise, it worked
> correctly.
>
> My 'real' GnuCash files were created in an older version, so maybe some
> incompatibility has been introduced. The budget tool in 2.6.11 completely
> ignores everything under expenses and income just as you describe. I've not
> figured it out yet. I know that the older version I used (2.4.11) didn't
> seem to have any of those summaries across the bottom - you had to run
> reports to see anything 'useful'.
>
> Did you first create your GnuCash files in an older version as I did?
>
> Best wishes,
> Richard.
>
> On 16 March 2016 at 05:57, Daniel Zeitoune <dnlzeitoune at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have been having an issue with the budget on my Gnucash version 2.6.11
> > running on Windows 10, I have put in all the figures but only my
> transfers
> > to savings accounts have shown up on the summary at the bottom, neither
> my
> > income or expenses are registering.
> >
> > any suggestions?
> >
> > thanks
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnucash-user mailing list
> > gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> > -----
> > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>