Reconciliation vs balance assertions

[kriesel at nurfuerspam.de]

Hi,

I understand that you want a warning. And there are actually two distinct warnings: One to change the reconciled split and another for a unreconciled split. Unfortunately you can only disable the warning for both together. I see this as a bug - and I definitely miss the old behaviour.

Cheers,
Christoph

> Am 14.09.2016 um 09:12 schrieb Geert Janssens <geert.gnucash at kobaltwit.be>:
> 
> On Wednesday 14 September 2016 08:26:45 kriesel at nurfuerspam.de <mailto:kriesel at nurfuerspam.de> wrote:
>> Hi Derek,
>> 
>> I did try to chase this down. Apparently in all 2.6 releases this is
>> broken. This is what I get:
>> 
>> When modifying a non-reconciled other split it warns me that this
>> might mess up reconciliation I then accept to change for the rest of
>> the session
>> Now it will not warn me any more even when I change the reconciled
>> split of the transaction
>> 
>> This is easy to reproduce with a new empty file. I am sure there was
>> no warning about changing non-reconciled splits in 2.4 and it worked
>> as you described then.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Christoph
>> 
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> I remember this change was discussed in the past. I didn't remember 
> whether it was actually implemented. It appears it is.
> 
> So I looked it up. It was indeed implemented by Robert Fewell and 
> committed by yours truly for gnucash 2.6 in this commit:
> https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/ef38df96a02027762978c0d79fc10d9225af4857 <https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/ef38df96a02027762978c0d79fc10d9225af4857>
> 
> Related bug report:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344869 <https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344869>
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Geert