[GNC] Downloading Mac Intel Version 3 gives me 2.6.19

[John Ralls]

Please remember to copy the list on all replies.

The archive of my earlier reply is
https://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-user/2018-April/076526.html <https://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-user/2018-April/076526.html>

Regards,
John Ralls


> On Apr 18, 2018, at 8:01 AM, Glen Byram (Gmail) <glen83501 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi John,
> I have looked through the many list messages I have received from GNC, both in my active mailboxes and my trash/spam folders.
> The only ones I can see from yourself to me are your comments that I have double posted - once to each of the two posts I did.
> I cannot see the actual answer you posted to my question, even though I see several other replies by yourself to other list posts.
> Could you confirm the answer you posted to my question, please?
> Many thanks,
> Glen
> 
> ---------------
> 
> Apologies. New to this and posted with the wrong email address. Re-posted with the one I registered with.
> 
> On 18/04/2018, 14:49, "gnucash-user on behalf of John Ralls" <gnucash-user-bounces+glen83501=gmail.com at gnucash.org on behalf of jralls at ceridwen.us> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Apr 17, 2018, at 3:20 AM, Glen Byram via gnucash-user <gnucash-user at gnucash.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> Probably just something I am doing but as per the subject, I download Gnucash-Intel-3.0-1.dmg but when I install it the Gnucash App says it is version 2.6.19.
>> 
>> Am I doing something wrong?
> 
>    You posted the same question, and I answered, yesterday.
> 
>    Regards,
>    John Ralls
> 
>    _______________________________________________
>    gnucash-user mailing list
>    gnucash-user at gnucash.org
>    To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
>    https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
>    If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
>    -----
>    Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>    You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
> 
> 
>