[GNC] Hangs on startup

[David Carlson]

Finbar,

Your screen grab did not come through all the way to my computer.

Have you read any of the discussion here about the first start-up of
release 3.2 being more slow than normal, and subsequent start-ups still
being substantially slower than 2.6 21 or earlier?  In Windows in
particular the O.S. will think that GnuCashh is not responding, in some
cases for several minutes.  You have time to brew a pot of coffee and maybe
drink it too.

Also, GnuCash has historically been very slow to open certain reports,
especially when started in the default settings or with custom settings
encompassing a lot of data.

Have you tried creating a tiny test data file to see if it works faster
with less data?

David C

On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Finbar Mahon <mahon.finbar at neuf.fr> wrote:

> I attached a capture of the startup screen, but it didn't make it. It
> showed a "hang" while attempting to load a P+L I don't have, named P+L for
> 1.1.2020
>
>
>
> On 03/08/2018 16:18, Finbar Mahon wrote:
>
>> I don't have a P+L for 1/1/192020!!
>>
>> Hangs at this point, most times, sometimes loads the current operations.
>>
>> Ideas?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnucash-user mailing list
>> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
>> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
>> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
>> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
>> -----
>> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>