[GNC] Going Back to Go Forward?

Michael mjchurchil at aol.com
Mon Aug 6 23:40:43 EDT 2018


I guess I hadn't tried to do a paste into a transaction.  I see what 
you mean, although I didn't need to restart gnucash to recover.  While 
I was typing the answer came from David Reiser that it will be fixed 
when 3.3 comes out.  Mike

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 8:12 PM, Thomas Forrester 
<tlforrester at gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, in particular, what I mentioned in the original post: once you 
> use
> the clipboard to paste into a transaction, all further editing of 
> that. or
> apparently anything else is just not going to happen until you 
> restart the
> program.  To me, that's about the biggest show-stopper I could ever
> consider with *any* program - having to restart it all the time just 
> to get
> it working again.  I should think this massive problem would have been
> corrected almost immediately given the magnitude of the inconvenience 
> it
> causes, but it has been quite a while and I have no clue how long it 
> will
> take.
> 
> If someone can tell me it's already been fixed and there is a 3.2.1 
> (or
> whatever) release due any second now, great!  I'll wait it out.  But 
> a few
> more months till something happens, well, um...
> 
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 11:18 AM Adrien Monteleone <
> adrien.monteleone at lusfiber.net> wrote:
> 
>>  You may not get a warning or alert!
>> 
>>  Also, yes, at the very least the date/time stamps are different and 
>> this
>>  is particularly an issue with the MySQL backend if I recall 
>> correctly. I
>>  wouldn’t attempt to step back any further than 2.6.21, but I’d 
>> ask, what in
>>  particular are you finding that you need to step back for?
>> 
>>  There were some early issues with data but those seem to have been 
>> solved
>>  by 3.2. (I’m using the sqlite3 backend, and had to switch to XML 
>> during the
>>  interim but am back to normal with the 3.2 release) Sure there are 
>> a few
>>  annoyances with the 3.x series so far, but those are being worked 
>> out.
>> 
>>  Regards,
>>  Adrien
>> 
>>  > On Aug 6, 2018, at 10:15 AM, Thomas Forrester 
>> <tlforrester at gmail.com>
>>  wrote:
>>  >
>>  > Thanks, Mike.
>>  >
>>  > So from what you are saying, there is some sort of data 
>> structures check
>>  > that would alert me if I am using a version of the program that is
>>  > incompatible with the data version.  Checking my downloads, I 
>> find I have
>>  > the .21 installer which I wouldn't have unless I had installed 
>> that
>>  > version.  So Looks like I may be good to take a step back.
>>  >
>>  > Maybe a corollary question then -  although backward compatible 
>> with a
>>  .21
>>  > database, does 3.x introduce any new changes to the data 
>> structures that
>>  > would make this a really bad idea?
>>  >
>>  > On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 9:26 AM Michael <mjchurchil at aol.com> wrote:
>>  >
>>  >> It is my understanding that 2.6.21 is the only 2.6.x that is 
>> compatible
>>  >> with the 3.2 data structure.  I have used 2.6.21 successfully 
>> with 3.2
>>  >> data, but older 2.6.x report that they are not compatible.  I 
>> believe
>>  that
>>  >> is true of xml and sql databases.  Mike
>>  >>
>>  >> On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 4:17 AM, Thomas Forrester 
>> <tlforrester at gmail.com
>>  >
>>  >> wrote:
>>  >>
>>  >> On a Windows computer, I upgraded to 3.2 from 2.6.20 I think it 
>> was back
>>  >> when I first noticed version 3 had been released. Took me till 
>> 3.2 to
>>  >> notice, but I think it was within a few days of the 3.2 release 
>> Having
>>  now
>>  >> used 3.2 for a short while, I'm wondering if there's any issue 
>> with
>>  going
>>  >> back to 2.6.x? In other words, are there any underlying data 
>> structure
>>  >> changes, or other file changes, that would make this a huge 
>> mistake? I
>>  am
>>  >> using the MySQL database backend. I just feel at this point 
>> that, if I
>>  >> can't further edit anything after pasting something in from the
>>  clipboard,
>>  >> that it may be a better idea to go back so I can go forward.
>>  >> _______________________________________________ gnucash-user 
>> mailing
>>  list
>>  >> gnucash-user at gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences 
>> or to
>>  >> unsubscribe: 
>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If
>>  >> you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
>>  >> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more 
>> information. -----
>>  >> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do 
>> this by
>>  >> using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  > _______________________________________________
>>  > gnucash-user mailing list
>>  > gnucash-user at gnucash.org
>>  > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
>>  > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
>>  > If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
>>  https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
>>  > -----
>>  > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>>  > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>>  >
>> 
>> 
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  gnucash-user mailing list
>>  gnucash-user at gnucash.org
>>  To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
>>  https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
>>  If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
>>  https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
>>  -----
>>  Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>>  You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.


More information about the gnucash-user mailing list