variable scheduled date

[Dave H]

Hi Jean-David,

Yes version 2.4.15 was released just over 4 years / 20 versions ago so I'm
not surprised you're missing out on a lot of the good stuff :-)

I'm sure there must be ways of updating to a later version even on RedHat
just like I have already done on Ubuntu.

I see epel list an srpm for gnucash 2.6.18-1 under both
http://download3.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/7/SRPMS/Packages/g/ and
http://download3.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/7Server/SRPMS/Packages/g/ so
I'm surprised you can't upgrade to at least that version ?

Cheers Dave H.

On 24 February 2018 at 03:12, Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8 at verizon.net>
wrote:

> On 02/23/2018 12:02 PM, Fross, Michael wrote:
> > I am running the latest stable version (2.6.19), but I see the following
> > per the screenshot.  There are a lot of options.  This is on Ubuntu, but
> > I see the same options on Windows.
> >
> Those additions you see must have occurred since my version of GnuCash.
> Unfortunately, I will be unable to upgrade until EPEL do it, and that is
> unlikely. So until I upgrade my Linux distribution to RHEL8 (not yet
> released), I must stay here.
>
> I am running GnuCash 2.4.15 that I do not suppose is the latest and
> greatest (2.6.19), but gnucash-2.4.15-4.el6.x86_64.rpm is what is
> available on EPEL for my distribution of Linux (RHEL6).
>
>
> --
>   .~.  Jean-David Beyer          Registered Linux User 85642.
>   /V\  PGP-Key:166D840A 0C610C8B Registered Machine  1935521.
>  /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey    http://linuxcounter.net
>  ^^-^^ 12:10:01 up 29 days, 1:07, 2 users, load average: 5.70, 5.59, 5.05
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>