[GNC] Moving to Gnucash 3

[GTI .H]

I found it odd to get stuck on an earlier version without testing a new one
before.

I use GnuCash 3.3 on W10 without major issues, except for what development
has not yet given us and the critical version migration issues have already
been resolved and I've helped in this.
Bug reporting is one way we can help.

Updating and downgrade is very simple.


--
Regards
GTI

Em dom, 25 de nov de 2018 às 11:57, Geert Janssens <
geert.gnucash at kobaltwit.be> escreveu:

> David,
>
> You keep saying this. While I respect your choice to stay on the safe
> side,
> the only way to know if gnucash 3.x works for you is to test it. That's
> pretty
> easy in Windows.
>
> So I encourage you to run a few tests on a backup of your data file and
> evaluate how good or bad that works out. I'd love to hear your personal,
> first-hand experience instead of how you're currently expressing concerns
> based on what you've read.
>
> There are issues, but it's not like gnucash 3.x has suddenly become
> completely
> unusable.
>
> Regards,
>
> Geert
>
> Op zondag 25 november 2018 04:07:52 CET schreef David Carlson:
> > Paul,
> >
> > You are not the only one that concerned about whether the new releases
> meet
> > your needs any better than what you used before.  A bird in hand is
> > better...
> >
> > I am staying with my favorite 2.6.15 or 2.6.17 until I am satisfied that
> > 3.4 or whatever is sufficiently well debugged to not present any serious
> > regressions for my needs.
> >
> > David C
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 4:33 PM Paul Schwartz <pmjs1115 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > I have files that contain many years of transactions [<2 MB]. Last year
> > > was
> > > done with 2.6.12 which I think provides accurate numbers. Starting a
> new
> > > computer on Windows 10, I would like to transition to 3.3 and stay
> > > current.
> > >
> > > When I open an old file and run a balance sheet I get some very strange
> > > results in my stock accounts. Some stocks are very simple: a purchase
> for
> > > cash, one transaction. Sometimes the report left justifies the amount
> of
> > > the stock and correctly reports the value of the purchase. Sometimes it
> > > right justifies the amount of the stock and reports zero for the
> value. I
> > > have looked at how the accounts are setup, and they look identical.
> > >
> > > I have other stocks that are more complex: there are simple purchases
> and
> > > then debits or credits for $ amounts with zero shares. Those are always
> > > reported with zero value.
> > >
> > > I would like to solve the simple cases first. Any help is greatly
> > > appreciated as I don't want to be frozen to using the old gnucash
> version.
> > >
> > > Paul
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gnucash-user mailing list
> > > gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> > > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> > > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> > > If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
> > > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
> > > -----
> > > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> > > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnucash-user mailing list
> > gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> > If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
> > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. -----
> > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>


-- 
Regards
GTI