[GNC] Invoice date field starts too narrow

[David H]

I don't use any of the business features/invoices either but this is the
default behaviour in normal account register windows on Win 10 as well.  I
get around it by manually widening all date columns to allow for the drop
down arrow when the date is highlighted.  If I double click the header to
autosize it the days are dropped off and instead of seeing 15/12/2019
(dd/mm/ccyy) and the drop down arrow I get /12/2019. I thought there'd been
a bug/enhancement report raised a couple of years back to fix this
behaviour but I could be wrong.

Cheers Dave H.


On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 at 04:11, Adrien Monteleone <
adrien.monteleone at lusfiber.net> wrote:

> Hmm... I didn’t notice this back when I was using 3.6 but it might have
> happened for me as well.
>
> I’m presently on 3.7 and I’ve since upgraded to Catalina.
>
> Perhaps try 3.7 on Mojave and see if the problem is resolved. (3.7 was
> released in September, and another is on the way at the end of this month)
>
> Regards,
> Adrien
>
> > On Dec 14, 2019 w50d348, at 11:13 AM, Axel Essbaum <axel at essbaum.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Manually widening the date field applies only to that invoice, and only
> as long as the invoice's tab is open. If I close the invoice's tab and
> reopen I get a narrow date fields again.  Creating a new invoice also
> results in a narrow date field.  As far as I can tell no adjustment to
> field widths is carried forward to subsequent invoices.
> >
> > Date order has no effect - MDY is also chopped off for me.
> >
> > I'm on macOS Mojave, GC 3.6 - Build ID: 3.6+(2019-06-29)
> >
> > - Axel
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>