[GNC] Failed - import of QIF files from Quicken

[Christopher Lam]

Hello
If you'll be kind to offer the QIF file in bugzilla or privately -- feel
free to amend it manually first to anonymize details, it will be useful to
debug.
C


On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 15:09, Tom Hatzigeorgiou <tomhatz at hotmail.com> wrote:

> I have seen  few emails on this subject.
>
> Please see if the below statements would help you.
>
>
> I've been having a problem with importing my data from Quicken and into
> GNUCASH for Windows using a QIF file created by Quicken. I’ve over 30 years
> of data with thousands of transactions spanning multiple accounts and
> categories.
>
> I have found that there is an issue with the importer starting with
> version 3.2 (I think).
>
> As mentioned  by others, the importer would fail without giving an error.
>
> I have solved the issue by installing GNUCASH 3.1 importing my data and
> then installing the latest version (currently 3.8). Of course this assumes
> that you will be able to find the 3.1 install file. I hope you can find it
> in one of the archives.
>
> I don’t see any problem with my data after I open the file (in GNU 3.8)
> created by the GNUCASH 3.1.
>
> I was wondering if the developers could replace the importer (of the
> latest version) with the version that existed in the 3.1 version (until the
> import issue is fixed). I believe it would solved a lot of problems for a
> lot of people.
>
> I have another issue getting security prices and bank transaction. I have
> read a lot of solutions but none has help me. When I find a simple solution
> to this problem I will post here.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>