[GNC] GC 2.6.19 & GC 3.8

[Les]

Thanks for the update Tommy.

On 3/4/20 5:52 PM, Tommy Trussell wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:20 PM Les <lelliott5 at gmail.com 
> <mailto:lelliott5 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     After using the 3.8 version on Linux Mint 19.1, I find that is much
>     faster than the 2.6.19 version.  I have one issue regarding the
>     accounts
>     page, I entered an incorrect amount for a payment and then tried to
>     remove it (even deleting the line) but nothing worked.  I finally
>     closed
>     GC without saving and reopened it and entered the correct information.
>
>     Is this a known bug?
>
>
> I have noticed this, too; I believe it's a screen refresh issue. I'm 
> trying to replicate it on Ubuntu 19.10 and cannot, so I think it's an 
> issue with a build based upon Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (which your Mint 
> probably is). That's the version I use in my office.
>
> Here's what I have noticed -- I click on a transaction and choose 
> Delete from the toolbar. A confirmation dialog pops up, and I agree 
> that I want to delete, but the transaction does not disappear from the 
> register. HOWEVER if I close and reopen the register, (or maybe if I 
> choose View --> Refresh ?) the transaction is gone.
>
> I have noticed a few other display issues with GnuCash built for 
> Ubuntu 18.04. The register colors are strange around the text, 
> especially noticeably on the date field.
>
> Unfortunately I also noticed that the spacing of items on the register 
> changed slightly when I installed the GTK Inspector (as was discussed 
> on this list a few days ago in reference to CSS issues). I say 
> "unfortunately" because I believe it was the act of installing the 
> libraries and other components of the development tools that subtly 
> changed the way the application appears, which I presume might make it 
> harder to fix.
>
> I glanced through the bug reports in bugzilla and didn't see one but 
> maybe I missed it.
>
>     -----
>     Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>     You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>