[GNC] Making the leap to latest

[D.]

Of course, the Windows installer takes care of uninstalling other versions for you, so upgrading or downgrading is a simple matter of running the appropriate exe. And if you retain the different versions' download files,  running them is simply a matter of double clicking the proper one. 



-------- Original Message --------
From: AC <gnucash at acarver.net>
Sent: Wed Oct 06 03:52:18 EDT 2021
To: Peter West <pbw at pbw.id.au>
Cc: GnuCash users group <gnucash-user at gnucash.org>, Derek Atkins <derek at ihtfp.com>
Subject: Re: [GNC] Making the leap to latest

The main problem is that you can't have side-by-side installations on a
Windows system (as has been pointed out to me).  So upgrading the
software means uninstalling the old one, installing the new one and, if
anything goes wrong, reversing that entire process.  A side-by-side
install would let me run both to make sure no issues and then I can
uninstall the older one later once I tested the new one.

However, I think I have a workaround, I'll install a Linux guest VM (I
already have other VMs running on the same box) and do the updates
through the VM first reading in the data each time to save to the new
formats.  If all goes well I'll install the Windows version on the
machine and move the newly converted data files back to the machine from
the VM.

On 2021-10-03 20:27, Peter West wrote:
> I would disagree with “don’t upgrade unless entirely necessary." Open source software (OSS) requires a different approach. Proprietary software offers guarantees of the support lifetime of the software you purchase, paid for by your money. The resources for development and support are very limited and voluntary. The benefits of OSS come with some implied responsibilities.
> 
> Keep your software up-to-date.
> 	Keep the installer for you current version of the software. When the next version is released, secure the backup of your date and install the new software. If something goes wrong, re-install the working version, restore your date, and report your problem. We recently had two successive install difficulties, for example. You don’t need to keep the dud installers, obviously.
> 
> Keep an eye on the mailing list, and offer your suggestions to other users if yo think you know how to fix their problems.
> 
> Peter
> —
> Peter West
> pbw at ehealth.id.au
> “The one who hears you hears me, and the one who rejects you rejects me, and the one who rejects me rejects him who sent me.”
> 
> 
>> On 3 Oct 2021, at 8:11 am, AC <gnucash at acarver.net> wrote:
>>
>> I agree don't upgrade if not absolutely necessary but I will likely be
>> replacing this computer in a few months so starting from a newer
>> installation is much more likely to happen in that case.
>>
>> So you're saying I should be able to do three stages of 2.6.last,
>> 3.x.last and then 4.x.last?
>>
>> Are there any big changes to basic functionality from 2.6 to 4.x?  I'm
>> making my way through the change logs but a lot of it is related to
>> various features I don't use (at least that which I've read thus far).
>>
>>
>> On 2021-10-02 15:06, Derek Atkins wrote:
>>>> From 2.6.3 you will need to jump to 2.6.last, then 3.x, then 4.x
>>>
>>> At every version you should load your data file and then save it.
>>>
>>> While there is no requirement to upgrade, and "if it ain't broke, don't
>>> fix it" may apply, if you have a system crash and need to rebuild your
>>> system, it'll be easier to use recent versions.
>>>
>>> -derek
>>> Sent using my mobile device. Please excuse any typos.
>>> On October 2, 2021 5:56:23 PM AC <gnucash at acarver.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok, I've been running along on 2.6.3 on Win 10.  No issues to date that
>>>> I can see.
>>>>
>>>> I know there's been various changes throughout the rest of the 2.x and
>>>> 3.x series and we're now on 4.x which sparks some questions:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do I really need to update?  I only use the basis ledgers for standard
>>>> banking accounts, credit cards, loans, mutual funds; scheduled
>>>> transactions; and basic reports (typically just the standard transaction
>>>> report when I need a list for taxes). I don't use online transactions,
>>>> imports, or business features.  Can I assume that the basics still work
>>>> the same way?
>>>>
>>>> If it's better for me to go ahead and update how painful will it be to
>>>> update?
>>>>
>>>> I recall some suggestions previously about upgrading in increments and
>>>> if that's the case how many increments am I going to need (hopefully not
>>>> one for every point version)?
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gnucash-user mailing list
>>>> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
>>>> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
>>>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
>>>> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
>>>> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
>>>> -----
>>>> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>>>> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnucash-user mailing list
>> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
>> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
>> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
>> -----
>> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
> 

_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user at gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.