[GNC] Report zoom in version 4.9

[TG]

Howdy,
yes sorry should have mentioned the version coming from!
both old and new are on Windows 10, with a MariaDB on a separate Linux 
server as the back-end
I'm guessing the updated graph engine is what's changed.  I couldn't 
find the version so I went to look at roughly when and it was installed 
and it was roughly at the end of 2019, so I"m guessing at version 3.8
best,
TG


On 2022-04-22 10:46, john wrote:
> For what value of previous?
> 
> We haven't done anything deliberately to remove that behavior, nor did
> we do anything deliberate to create it. In the last several years
> we've upgraded the GUI framework from Gtk2 to Gtk3 and replaced the
> graphing engine because the old one's developers stopped maintaining
> while the WebKitGtk browser library has gone through many, many
> revisions. Further back we replaced the html rendering from a Gtk
> facility (GtkHTML) and graph-drawing pinched from GtkOffice in favor
> of WebKitGtk, again because GtkHTML was removed from Gtk.
> 
> Regards,
> John Ralls
> 
> 
>> On Apr 17, 2022, at 6:58 PM, TG <gnucash at thegeezer.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Howdy all,
>> 
>> I'm sure I'm missing something obvious,
>> 
>> In previous version of gnucash I was able to pull up a line graph 
>> report and then draw a box on teh graph, which would cause the graph 
>> to zoom in on that section.
>> 
>> I upgraded to version 4.9 earlier this year and now I'm not able to 
>> zoom graphs at all, having to control size by pixel dimensions and 
>> start / end dates only.
>> 
>> Any suggestions, or was this feature simply removed?
>> 
>> thanks!
>> 
>> TG
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnucash-user mailing list
>> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
>> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
>> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
>> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
>> -----
>> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.