[GNC] Request for two new features in GnuCash

[R. Victor Klassen]

Actually you can edit the suggested payment amount, and only “process” a partial payment.  Then you can pay again, using Process Payment, and pay with a different account for the second payment.

> On Aug 8, 2022, at 11:40 AM, Adrien Monteleone <adrien.monteleone at lusfiber.net> wrote:
> 
> I agree, this is already possible, but *not* using the 'Process Payment' feature as it is currently implemented. (that is, if one is paying on a Vendor invoice.)
> 
> To accomplish this, you have to enter the payment with multiple source splits as Frank and others have noted, and AP as the debit split, then you have to 'assign as payment' on the AP split using the right-click context menu. (you might have to commit the transaction first, I don't recall if it works before commit.)
> 
> This will then let you assign the multi-source payment to an Invoice.
> 
> I see the feature request as changing the Process Payment dialog to support multiple sources. (A request I've seen here before)
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Adrien
> 
> On 8/6/22 11:19 PM, Frank H. Ellenberger wrote:
>> Am 07.08.22 um 03:04 schrieb Eric Hammond:
>>> The second is the ability to pay bills from more than one source. Example I purchase an oscilloscope and pay for it with a cash incentive from the company and a bank transfer for the rest. My solution at the present is not pretty, nor helpful if I look at it next year.
>> Then it's time to claim your easter egg ;-):
>> Edit->Peeferences->Register Defaults,
>> select Default Style: "Auto-Split ledger" or "Transaction Journal"
>> More details in
>> https://www.gnucash.org/docs/v4/C/gnucash-help/set-prefs.html#prefs-reg-def
>> Then you can easily enter the differnt amounts.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.