[GNC] Scheduled transactions do not appear in the register until <enter> is pressed

[Glenn Fowler]

I still consider this a bug and not a feature request since not seeing an
up-to-date register could really throw things off.

To the community and GnuCash team - should I open an issue in Bugzilla?

On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 12:02 PM Tom Veik <tlveik at gmail.com> wrote:

> Replying to an old thread I found with a search.
>
> Using GnuCash version 4.11 on Windows 11.  I've been using GnuCash for a
> few years and very happy with it.  I haven't seen this problem until
> recently when I switched my scheduled transactions from no automatic
> entry with reminders, to automatic advanced entry with no reminders.
> Like Glenn, I have "run when the data file is opened" checked, and now I
> see this same problem that the created transactions don't show up in the
> register.  I was restarting GnuCash to see the new entries in the
> register.  Appreciate the tip that pressing  <enter>  helps.
>
> I haven't been able to find any other resolution in my search so I
> though I'd just mention what I'm seeing here.
>
> Tom
>
> On /Fri Oct 1 17:58:51 EDT 2021/, *Glenn Fowler* wrote:
>
> > I have numerous scheduled transactions in multiple books and in settings
> > have them "run when the data file is opened". The transactions do run as
> > expected but do not appear in the register until you press <enter>.
> > With them not appearing, I am not looking at an out of date register
> until
> > I enter a transaction or press <enter>. Wouldn't it make sense for them
> to
> > appear without user input so we are looking at up-to-date books instead
> of
> > trying to create a habit for myself to click <enter> on every open?
> >
> > Thank you
> > Glenn
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>