Web page proposal

[Jon Lapham]

Jeff MacDonald wrote:
> I respectfully disagree with use of "in development".. we *know* it's in
> development, and newbies might think that if it's in development it is
> somehow unstable or that they should look for 'better' documentation
> instead. just be careful about wording :)

I agree 100%.

Check out the HTML-ified version of my proposal I just made.

http://www.jandr.org/temp/www.gnucash.org/
http://www.jandr.org/temp/www.gnucash.org/documentation.html

By "in development" documentation I meant for some future version of 
gnucash that doesn't exist as the stable version yet.  We would want 
newbies to not use it.  I think it is probably clearer to look at the 
example pages I made.

The "in developement" version of docs for the stable version of GnuCash 
would simply be the v1.8 docs (in this case).  The words "in 
development" would not appear.

Thanks,
-Jon

-- 
-**-*-*---*-*---*-*---*-----*-*-----*---*-*---*-----*-----*-*-----*---
  Jon Lapham  <lapham at extracta.com.br>          Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
  Work: Extracta Moléculas Naturais SA     http://www.extracta.com.br/
  Web: http://www.jandr.org/
***-*--*----*-------*------------*--------------------*---------------