Web page proposal

[Chris Lyttle]

This looks good to me

Chris

On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 12:35, Jon Lapham wrote:
> Jeff MacDonald wrote:
> > I respectfully disagree with use of "in development".. we *know* it's in
> > development, and newbies might think that if it's in development it is
> > somehow unstable or that they should look for 'better' documentation
> > instead. just be careful about wording :)
> 
> I agree 100%.
> 
> Check out the HTML-ified version of my proposal I just made.
> 
> http://www.jandr.org/temp/www.gnucash.org/
> http://www.jandr.org/temp/www.gnucash.org/documentation.html
> 
> By "in development" documentation I meant for some future version of 
> gnucash that doesn't exist as the stable version yet.  We would want 
> newbies to not use it.  I think it is probably clearer to look at the 
> example pages I made.
> 
> The "in developement" version of docs for the stable version of GnuCash 
> would simply be the v1.8 docs (in this case).  The words "in 
> development" would not appear.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Jon
-- 
RedHat Certified Engineer #807302549405490.
Checkpoint Certified Security Expert 2000 & NG
--------------------------------------------
	|^|
	| |   |^|
	| |^| | |  Life out here is raw 
	| | |^| |  But we will never stop
	| |_|_| |  We will never quit 
	| / __> |  cause we are Metallica
	|/ /    |
	\       /
	 |     |
--------------------------------------------