FreqSpec and SchedXaction as QOF objects

[Derek Atkins]

Quoting Neil Williams <linux at codehelp.co.uk>:


> 
> > Personally I don't have a strong opinion on what stays in libqof and what
> > stays in src/engine.  I dont have as clear a dividing line in my mind as
> > you do in yours.
> 
> To me, QOF - as a library - shouldn't pre-define objects that are not 
> fundamental to it's purpose. It defines books, collections and sessions but 
> you cannot have QOF without those.
> 
> I'll remove FreqSpec from QOF next commit.

Except QOF also defines Dates, Numerics, and other objects that's not
fundamental to its purpose, either.  I sort of see FS in that same category, a
general-purpose data type that could be used by muliple apps (theoretically).

*shrugs*  I honestly don't have a strong opinion.

-derek
-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       warlord at MIT.EDU                        PGP key available