[DRAFT] Proposed release schedule for 1.9.x

[Benoit Grégoire]

> For the record, I agree with this, and I also think we should have a
> standard way to say which bugs are critical enough that they should
> be fixed before 2.0.  I would propose that we create a standard
> query (which we can link to from the wiki) that lists the set of open
> bugs remaining..
>
> I would propose that we say that 'release=SVN' and either 'priority>3'
> or 'severity>[something]' (i'm not sure exactly how to categorize this..
> But having a link from the wiki to bugzilla to display the set of open
> bugs would be IMHO a Good Thing (TM).

With trac we'd get all that for free... 
-- 
Benoit Grégoire, http://benoitg.coeus.ca/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/attachments/20060116/bf8589d8/attachment.bin