SX not entered to Register
Volker Englisch
Volker at englisch.us
Fri Feb 9 21:10:24 EST 2007
On 02/09/2007 02:01 PM Josh Sled wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 01:19 -0500, Volker Englisch wrote:
>
>> a) Enter Values
>> I just build GC 2.0.4 (R15521) on FC6. I have a scheduled transaction
>> for a utility bill coming up. I click the "(need value)" field and
>> enter the amount for the transaction and then I click OK.
>> However, the transaction is not being entered to the register of the
>> utility.
>> Maybe I'm not using the new interface correctly?
>
> No, that sounds like the right path through the dialog. One thing to do
> is check the "Review created transactions" checkbox, make sure the list
> contains what you expect
No, that list does not contain the transaction I'm trying to enter.
In fact, I have multiple transactions that are listed with the Instance
State of 'Created' but they aren't included in the 'Review Register'.
I am wondering if the transaction doesn't get created because it has the
status of 'Reminder'?
Let me know if you'd like me to create screen shots to see this.
> and then compare that to the normal register
> for the involved accounts.
The transaction that _is_ displayed in the 'Review Register' does get
entered properly to the register.
>> c) Delete Auto-created transactions
>> I have a daily expense that I'm keeping track of which is auto-created
>> using a scheduled transaction. Once in a while I do not have this
>> expense (i.e. didn't by lunch due to vacation).
>> With the old interface I was able to delete auto-created transactions
>> before they were added to the register.
>> How do I delete an auto-created transaction from the SLR interface or
>> will I have to go to the expense account to delete those transactions?
>
> Here, I was about to suggest you use the "Review created transactions"
> list, they're not present in that list/search. It seems like they
> should be, so I guess that's a bug. Would that be sufficent ... it
> seems like it's similar to the review page you'd get in the old UI.
Yes, this would work. However, I don't see how this would allow someone
to hold back a transaction for a couple of days, if necessary?
For instance, I am getting a rent check every month which is due on the
first of the month but I delay the entry to the register until I have
the check in my hand. The old UI allowed me to set the status of such a
transaction to 'Postpone' until I release it.
> Another option would be to make the "Created" state -- instead of
> insensitive -- a combo box with {"create as planned", "ignore"}, but I'd
> rather not.
In this case I would suggest 'Create as planned', 'Ignore', 'Postpone',
and 'Create now'.
To be honest, I am not too crazy about the new SLR interface. I have 65
scheduled transactions and with the new interface I will always have to
scroll through the list to find one that may need to have values
entered. The old interface only showed those transactions I needed to
act upon but not the entire list. I could imagine having the list
sorted by 'Instance State' so that the relevant transactions would
bubble to the top.
More information about the gnucash-devel
mailing list