jralls at ceridwen.us
Thu Jan 11 09:56:20 EST 2018
It might indeed work. The core devs are focussed on other priorities ATM so if you’d like to work it out we’ll look forward to your PR.
> On Jan 11, 2018, at 1:30 AM, Alen Siljak <alen.siljak at gmx.com> wrote:
> From my limited knowledge of Python, this sounds like something that could be mitigated by a virtual environment, perhaps?
> In that case, there could be the "officially-supported" version of Python so an advanced user would have to set up the virtual environment with that version, etc. etc.
> Do you think this would be an option?
> Currently I'll dig a bit into the c# option but would still somehow prefer to work in Python, if/when possible.
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 at 2:59 AM
> From: "John Ralls" <jralls at ceridwen.us>
> To: cicko <alen.siljak at gmx.com>
> Cc: gnucash-devel at gnucash.org
> Subject: Re: Boost/Python
> The bindings may work on Windows. They do work on MacOS, but we don’t include them in either AIO because they need to link libpython and so will work with only a single python version. <snip> Since the interpreter and the GnuCash bindings have to link the same libpython that creates a problem for an AIO.
More information about the gnucash-devel