1.4.10 crashes on Reports->Transaction Report
Jean-David Beyer
jdbeyer@exit109.com
Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:10:18 -0500
James LewisMoss wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 09:57:30 -0500, Jean-David Beyer <jdbeyer@exit109.com> said:
>
> Jean-David> Paul Lussier wrote:
> >>
> >> In a message dated: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:08:39 +1100 Robert Graham
> >> Merkel said:
> >>
> >> >That seems to imply that it's not a crash in the traditional
> >> >sense of the word - rather the "exit" call is being made
> >> >erroneously.
> >> >
> >> >I'm a little stumped here. Could you try 1.4.11 at some stage
> >> >and see if the problem still occurs?
> >>
> >> Okay, 1.4.11 seems a lot better. THough the sorting problem is
> >> back that I mentioned under 1.4.9 (which was the reason we all
> >> decided I should try 1.4.10 :)
>
> Jean-David> 1.) How come the mailer daemon for this mailing list does
> Jean-David> not stuff the gnucash-user@lists.gnumatic.com into the
> Jean-David> ReplyTo field. The way it is now, if I do not fix it, it
> Jean-David> replies only to the original poster. That may be fine,
> Jean-David> but not usually what I want. Am I unusual, or should this
> Jean-David> be fixed?
>
> Because most mailers will let you reply to a list, reply to the poster
> or both unless the reply-to is added in which case these same mailers
> will only send to the reply to. Look for something like "feedback"
> for the reply to list command.
>
I have the choice of replying to the sender, or replying to the sender
with Cc to the rest of the recipients. So to reply only to the list, I
must select reply to everyone, delete the sender, and change the list
from Cc: to To: Not ideal.
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ Registered Machine 73926.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org
^^-^^ 11:05am up 16 days, 18:09, 4 users, load average: 2.17, 2.14,
2.03