1.4.10 crashes on Reports->Transaction Report

Jean-David Beyer jdbeyer@exit109.com
Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:10:18 -0500


James LewisMoss wrote:
> 
> >>>>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 09:57:30 -0500, Jean-David Beyer <jdbeyer@exit109.com> said:
> 
>  Jean-David> Paul Lussier wrote:
>  >>
>  >> In a message dated: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:08:39 +1100 Robert Graham
>  >> Merkel said:
>  >>
>  >> >That seems to imply that it's not a crash in the traditional
>  >> >sense of the word - rather the "exit" call is being made
>  >> >erroneously.
>  >> >
>  >> >I'm a little stumped here.  Could you try 1.4.11 at some stage
>  >> >and see if the problem still occurs?
>  >>
>  >> Okay, 1.4.11 seems a lot better.  THough the sorting problem is
>  >> back that I mentioned under 1.4.9 (which was the reason we all
>  >> decided I should try 1.4.10 :)
> 
>  Jean-David> 1.) How come the mailer daemon for this mailing list does
>  Jean-David> not stuff the gnucash-user@lists.gnumatic.com into the
>  Jean-David> ReplyTo field. The way it is now, if I do not fix it, it
>  Jean-David> replies only to the original poster.  That may be fine,
>  Jean-David> but not usually what I want. Am I unusual, or should this
>  Jean-David> be fixed?
> 
> Because most mailers will let you reply to a list, reply to the poster
> or both unless the reply-to is added in which case these same mailers
> will only send to the reply to.  Look for something like "feedback"
> for the reply to list command.
> 
I have the choice of replying to the sender, or replying to the sender
with Cc to the rest of the recipients. So to reply only to the list, I
must select reply to everyone, delete the sender, and change the list
from Cc: to To:  Not ideal.

-- 
 .~.  Jean-David Beyer           Registered Linux User 85642.
 /V\                             Registered Machine    73926.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey     http://counter.li.org 
^^-^^ 11:05am up 16 days, 18:09, 4 users, load average: 2.17, 2.14,
2.03