Using Fink to build Gnucash on Snow Leopard (OS/X 10.6)

[David Reiser]

That would be because I haven't finished fixing/testing gnucash2 on  
Snow Leopard. There are definitely some things that Apple's gcc 4.2.1  
complains about that 4.0.1 didn't. And the last time I released  
gnucash in fink with --disable-error-on-warning set, I had a  
significant problem at runtime. I'm pretty close to finished, and  
gnucash 2.2.9 might even be available for 10.6 via fink later today.

Dave
On Sep 7, 2009, at 9:41 PM, Steve Drach wrote:

> I still haven't got the installable Gnucash to work on Snow Leopard,  
> so I thought I'd try fink, since I was successful building on  
> Leopard.  I think I've done everything right (see below).  Any  
> suggestions?
>
>
> $ fink index -f
> Scanning package description files..........
> $ fink scanpackages
> Password:
> Updating the list of locally available binary packages.
> Scanning dists/local/main/binary-darwin-i386
> Scanning dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-i386
> Scanning dists/stable/crypto/binary-darwin-i386
> Scanning dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386
> Scanning dists/unstable/crypto/binary-darwin-i386
> $ fink --version
> Package manager version: 0.29.9
> Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Mon Sep  7 18:07:07 2009,  
> 10.6, i386
>
> Copyright (c) 2001 Christoph Pfisterer
> Copyright (c) 2001-2009 The Fink Package Manager Team
> This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> GNU General Public License for more details.
> $ fink install gnucash2
> Scanning package description files..........
> Information about 8216 packages read in 6 seconds.
> Failed: no package found for specification 'gnucash2'!
> $
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

--
David Reiser
dbreiser at earthlink.net