Another one unhappy with quickfill

[Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz]

On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:07:17 -0800
Robert Plantz <rgplantz at gmail.com> wrote:

>On 1/16/2011 10:41 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
>> On Sunday 16 January 2011, Paul Abrahams wrote:
>>> Derek asked, "What is it about quickfill that you don't like?"
>>> Well, sometimes it will create a split transaction because I once
>>> had one but don't want one any longer.  And filling in a  split
>>> when it really isn't one is a lot of unnecessary work.  Even making
>>> the split go away is unnecessary labor.
>> Quite frankly, you're the second person I hear complaining about it.
>> I have some difficulty calling that "many".
>I'll increase the number of complaints by 50% by becoming the third 
>person. :-)
>
>My only complaint is with quickfill creating a split when the last 
>transaction with the same name was a split.

Make that 4. While I find it quite useful for non-split transactions, I
find it a total nuisance when it happens to create a split when I don't
want to create a split. Then it is a hassle getting rid of the split.





-- 

Best Regards,
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz