Reconciliation vs balance assertions

[Geert Janssens]

On Wednesday 14 September 2016 08:26:45 kriesel at nurfuerspam.de wrote:
> Hi Derek,
> 
> I did try to chase this down. Apparently in all 2.6 releases this is
> broken. This is what I get:
> 
> When modifying a non-reconciled other split it warns me that this
> might mess up reconciliation I then accept to change for the rest of
> the session
> Now it will not warn me any more even when I change the reconciled
> split of the transaction
> 
> This is easy to reproduce with a new empty file. I am sure there was
> no warning about changing non-reconciled splits in 2.4 and it worked
> as you described then.
> 
> Cheers,
> Christoph
> 
Hi Christoph,

I remember this change was discussed in the past. I didn't remember 
whether it was actually implemented. It appears it is.

So I looked it up. It was indeed implemented by Robert Fewell and 
committed by yours truly for gnucash 2.6 in this commit:
https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/ef38df96a02027762978c0d79fc10d9225af4857

Related bug report:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344869

Regards,

Geert