Accrual / Cash Acct
prl
prl at ozemail.com.au
Fri Jan 18 19:41:02 EST 2013
On 19/01/13 04:17, Christopher Lam wrote:
> ...
> I have little inclination to change my practices especially that I
> understand some of the risks. I prefer trusting my bank statement far
> more than I wish to enter individual transactions and try reconcile
> every month. But does anyone have any particular advice on what
> exactly I'll be missing by this method?
> ...
The idea of recording your transactions when they are made is that the
GnuCash balance includes the value of payments that you have made, but
are yet to be debited from your bank account. In my experience, this is
useful because there are often delays between making a payment and the
debit appearing in the bank account, which sometimes happens here in
Australia for credit or debit card transactions. It's particularly
useful for keeping track of cheque payments, as, at least in this
country, they typically take several days to clear, and there may also
be delays in the trader presenting the cheque for payment. However,
cheques are little used here (we wrote two cheques in 2012 and four in
2011).
Reconciling the account checks whether your record of the transactions
matches the bank's. Differences between the two are most often due to my
error, but doing a reconciliation helps find unauthorised transactions,
including fraudulent ones. I've found a couple of transaction errors
through reconciliation, and have been able to have the amounts refunded.
If you simply copy the bank's transaction record into GnuCash, I'm not
sure what role GnuCash is playing for you.
Peter
More information about the gnucash-user
mailing list