Managed fund - advanced portfolio wrong basis

david.carlson.417 david.carlson.417 at gmail.com
Sat Apr 9 11:25:56 EDT 2016


    

Chris,
If you look at your security account register voew you see the number of shares rather than the value.
Similarly,  that is true in some reports.   The advanced portfolio report was fine-tuned in release 2.6.12 and I have not seen the new version yet myself, but it sounds like you are seeing the number of shares.
Try playing with the report options to see what can be changed.
David C




Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S® 5 ACTIVE™, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone

-------- Original message --------
From: Chris Henderson <henders254 at gmail.com> 
Date: 4/8/2016  9:17 PM  (GMT-04:00) 
To: Mike Alexander <mta at umich.edu> 
Cc: gnucash-user <gnucash-user at gnucash.org> 
Subject: Re: Managed fund - advanced portfolio wrong basis 

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Mike Alexander <mta at umich.edu> wrote:

>
> On Apr 8, 2016, at 5:27 PM, Chris Henderson <henders254 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The fund is not publicly listed so I manually update the unit price in two
> ways: once every mid-month when I buy new stocks I update the price in the
> fund's tab and once at the beginning of each month I update the price in
> the price editor. I have already had "show prices" enabled and it shows the
> correct amount of around $2 per unit.
>
> As I mentioned before, the only thing wrong is the Basis: gnc is having
> the same basis as the number of stocks (aka shares) in advanced portfolio.
>
> I am doing everything right and compared my setup with this youtube video:
>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2fBS8FYzHU
>
> Should I go to price editor and delete the unit prices I have added
> manually?
>
>
> No, don’t change anything in the price editor, that’s not relevant.  I
> answered too quickly and got a bit confused about what your problem is.
> The price data base is used to calculate the current value of the security,
> not the basis.  The basis is derived from the various purchase and sales
> transactions for the security.  I have no idea why this isn’t working in
> your case, and I’m afraid I would have to see your transactions for this
> security to have any hope of finding out.
>
> Are you sure the purchases are recorded correctly?  A purchase or sale is
> recognized as a split that has a non-zero number of units for the security
> and a non-zero value.  Are there any sales or just purchases?  Is the
> report currency the same as the currency used to purchase and/or sell the
> security?  What is your setting for how to handle brokerage fees?  Is it
> set to “include in basis”?  I’m really at a loss about how it can come up
> with a purchase price of 1 for every transaction.
>


These are just purchases, there's no sales. And it's in the same currency.
There is no brokerage fees as well since the money comes out of a saving
account and goes directly to the fund. Fund fees are deducted off the top
of the fund's market capitalization each year.

I'm doing a split transaction:

The first-half of the split looks like this:

Account: Assets:Investments:Brokerage Account:Managed Fund:FundName
Shares: 1572
Price: $1.96
Buy: $3,000


The second-half of the split looks like this:
Account: Assets:Current Assets:Saving Account
Sell: $3,000

Thanks.
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user at gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.


More information about the gnucash-user mailing list